Brief · Use case · Public Affairs
Consultation Response Plan.
LivePlanPlan a response to a regulatory consultation: what it asks, where the decision points are, who is needed and what could derail it.
Consultation Response Plan is a ready-made use case for Public Affairs. It ships under the Plan template.
For regulatory and public affairs leads with a consultation deadline. You get the objective and critical path first, the sequence with exit criteria and owners, the external clocks you cannot compress, what could derail it and the first move. Dates are cited or marked as gaps.
Add it to your library to reuse from New → From template. Edit the saved copy in your library on the service form.
The decision
What is the plan for responding to a regulatory consultation that affects our product class: what the consultation asks, where the decision points are and what a strong response must cover?
The steps of the plan
A consultation has a published window, and everything before it is yours to plan. The plan starts from the window and works backward to the first move.
| Step | What it involves | The clock or source |
|---|---|---|
| Read what is asked | Restate each question the consultation puts, and mark which ones touch the product class. The plan does not infer a question that is not in the document. | The consultation document. |
| Map the decision points | Where the authority will decide, what it will weigh, and which of its questions your evidence can answer. | The authority’s published process and impact material. |
| Build the response | Draft the answers with their evidence, agree positions inside the company, and decide whether to respond alone or through an association. | Your own approvals; no external clock. |
| Submit inside the window | The European Commission’s standard minimum for a public consultation is 12 weeks, 14 over the summer holidays, and a call for evidence not paired with a consultation runs for 4 weeks. The consultation’s own page states its actual dates.1 | The Better Regulation guidelines and the “Have Your Say” portal. A 2026 Commission communication allows shorter windows in some cases. |
What the plan does
The window is the only hard date. The plan takes the consultation’s published opening and closing dates and counts back. Where the consultation is not an EU one, it says which authority’s rules apply and marks any unpublished date as a gap.1
One owner, one decision. The plan names one accountable owner and says who decides whether the company responds alone or with others, using a decision-role model that separates who recommends, who agrees and who decides.
What a strong response must cover. The plan lists the points the response must make, ordered by the questions the consultation asks and not by the company’s priorities.
How it could fail. The pre-mortem probes the failures this plan invites: the window shorter than expected, a key internal approver unavailable, evidence that arrives late, or an association position that differs from the company’s.
Recommended length
Standard
One team runs the plan and the gates are few. Standard carries the sequence, the clocks you do not control, what could derail it and the first move in about 1,500 words.
You can pick another length on the form. The other two stay available.
Assumptions the plan checks
The plan states the assumptions its dates rest on and says which one would move the finish if it failed. Examples for this plan:
- The consultation window is as published and has not been shortened or extended.
- The internal approvers are available in the weeks the plan needs them.
- The evidence the response cites already exists in citable form.
Standards, guidance and sources
The consultation clock
The decision practice behind the memo itself is on the template page.
What gets flagged
Any date the consultation does not state, any question the plan infers, and any approver or evidence the plan assumes without confirmation.
What arrives
- The objective
- The sequence
- Gates and decisions
- Who is needed
- Dependencies and external clocks
- What could derail it
- The first move
What it will not do
It does not promise dates. Each duration is sourced or marked as an estimate, and an unpublished deadline is a gap.
It does not write the response. It plans how the response gets written and approved.
It does not guarantee the dates. The durations are sourced or marked as estimates, and the plan says which.
It does not invent an agency’s deadlines. A deadline that is not published is a gap.
It does not run the plan. It gives an owner the first move and the criteria for the next gate.
References
- [1] European Commission. Better Regulation guidelines and toolbox: stakeholder consultation (public consultations of at least 12 weeks; calls for evidence of 4 weeks). Commission Communication COM(2026) 380 of 28 April 2026 on more flexible timelines. As summarized from search results; the 2026 communication was not read, and the revised guidelines were not found. Check the consultation’s own page for its dates.
Links checked 9 October 2026
These are the sources the template drew on. None of their authors or issuers has reviewed it.
About the Brief service
A Brief is a written answer from one specialist, at the depth you asked for. It arrives with its sources, and it closes by saying plainly what would change the conclusion. Nothing is hidden behind a summary, and anything the expert could not source is marked as a gap rather than filled in.
To edit a saved template, open New → Brief → From template, or the library rail on the service form.