Brief · Use case · Market Access
Specialty Payer Landscape.
LiveLandscapeGive the board a view of the US payer and PBM market for specialty medicines: concentration, who plays where and what it means for a launch.
Specialty Payer Landscape is a ready-made use case for Market Access. It ships under the Landscape template.
For market access and HEOR leads. You get the picture in brief, the boundary and inclusion rule, size and share estimates side by side, who plays where by segment and what it means for a launch. Figures are cited or marked as gaps.
Add it to your library to reuse from New → From template. Edit the saved copy in your library on the service form.
The decision
What is the landscape of the United States payer and pharmacy benefit manager market for specialty medicines, for a company preparing a specialty launch?
What is mapped
The market is concentrated, and the Federal Trade Commission has studied it. The landscape starts from its published findings and says where they are contested.
| Segment or source | What it holds | What the landscape does with it |
|---|---|---|
| The largest pharmacy benefit managers | The FTC’s interim staff report of 9 July 2024 covers the six largest: Caremark Rx, Express Scripts, OptumRx, Humana Pharmacy Solutions, Prime Therapeutics and MedImpact. It found that the three largest processed nearly 80 percent of about 6.6 billion prescriptions dispensed in 2023, and the six more than 90 percent.1 | The FTC’s report and press release. |
| Rebate aggregators | Three group purchasing organizations that negotiate rebates were added to the FTC’s study in 2023: Zinc Health Services, Ascent Health Services and Emisar Pharma Services.1 | The FTC’s report. |
| Specialty pharmacy and generics | The FTC’s second interim staff report of January 2025 focuses on specialty generic drugs and builds on the first.2 | The second interim report. |
| What payers ask of manufacturers | The evidence dossier payers use for coverage decisions, under the AMCP Format for Formulary Submissions.3 | The AMCP Format, version 4.1. |
What the landscape does
Concentration, with its source. The FTC reported that the three largest managers processed nearly 80 percent of prescriptions in 2023. The landscape cites it, and notes that this is a staff report in an ongoing study and that one commissioner dissented from its release, arguing that it did not weigh the savings that managers’ negotiation produces.1
A market with integrated players. The report describes vertically integrated managers that may steer patients to affiliated pharmacies. The landscape records each player’s affiliations as the report states them, and marks any it cannot confirm.1
What a launch must prepare. The AMCP Format is the common frame for the evidence dossier. The landscape says what it asks and that it is a guidance and not a mandate.3
What is shaping it. At Comprehensive length the landscape names the forces: scrutiny by regulators, consolidation, rebate practices, and the entry of new models, with the evidence for each.1,2
Recommended length
Comprehensive
The forces behind the market matter to the decision. Comprehensive adds the section on what is shaping it.
You can pick another length on the form. The other two stay available.
Assumptions the landscape checks
The landscape states the assumptions its boundary and its sizes rest on, and says what each gap limits. Examples for this market:
- The FTC’s 2023 figures describe the market the company will launch into.
- The six largest managers are the ones the launch must plan around.
- Affiliations stated in the report are unchanged.
Standards, guidance and sources
Primary sources
The decision practice behind the memo itself is on the template page.
What gets flagged
Any share that is for a different year from the one asked about, any affiliation the landscape could not confirm, and any claim from an interim staff report presented as a final finding.
What arrives
- The picture in brief
- Scope and boundary
- The market in numbers
- Who plays where
- What is shaping it
- What it means for us
- What we could not source
What it will not do
It does not rank players or give a single market size. It shows estimates side by side with their sources, and a position on a map is labeled analyst judgment.
It does not advise on contracting with any manager, and it is not antitrust analysis.
It does not give a single market size when the sources disagree. It shows each estimate and says why they differ.
It does not rank players. A map places them on defined axes and labels the placement as judgment.
It is a snapshot of one date, from public sources. A player it could not find is listed as a gap.
References
- [1] U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Pharmacy Benefit Managers: The Powerful Middlemen Inflating Drug Costs and Squeezing Main Street Pharmacies. Interim staff report, 9 July 2024. Figures as given in the FTC’s press release and search excerpts; the report was not read in full.
- [2] U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Second interim staff report on pharmacy benefit managers. January 2025. Known from the search listing; not read.
- [3] Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. AMCP Format for Formulary Submissions, Version 4.1. December 2019. Scope and status as given in AMCP’s release and search excerpts; the Format was not read in full.
Links checked 9 October 2026
These are the sources the template drew on. None of their authors or issuers has reviewed it.
About the Brief service
A Brief is a written answer from one specialist, at the depth you asked for. It arrives with its sources, and it closes by saying plainly what would change the conclusion. Nothing is hidden behind a summary, and anything the expert could not source is marked as a gap rather than filled in.
To edit a saved template, open New → Brief → From template, or the library rail on the service form.